Thursday, May 23, 2013

Lenin Raghuvanshi mentioned in calender in memory of RAOUL WALLENBERG


Lenin Raghuvanshi mentioned in calender in memory of RAOUL WALLENBERG: 
http://raoulwallenbergskolan.se/dagenshjalte/2013-05-18-lenin-raghuvanshi/

About Lenin on Swedish radio in part of world History:

Rs. 9,10,000/- compensation as sale consideration to a woman survivor:Ray of hope



Case Details of File Number: 28797/24/50/2011
Diary Number23710
Name of the ComplainantDR. LENIN, PVCHR
AddressSA-4/2A, DAULATPUR,
VARANASI , UTTAR PRADESH
Name of the VictimTRIVENI DEVI CHAUHAN
AddressVILL- KABRAI, PS- KABRAI,
MAHOBA , UTTAR PRADESH
Place of IncidentKABRAI
MAHOBA , UTTAR PRADESH
Date of Incident1/1/1991
Direction issued by the CommissionThis proceeding shall be read in continuation of the earlier proceeding of the Commission dated 7.1.2013. It was alleged by the complainant that four bighas of land belonging to Smt. Triveni Devi Chauhan, r/o village Kabrai, District Mahoba, UP, was used by the PWD in the year 2006 for construction of a road. However, Smt. Triveni Devi Chauhan was not given any compensation. When she approached the police station, her complaint was not registered. Pursuant to the directions of the Commission, the SP Mahoba, and the SE, PWD, Mahoba had sent their reports dated 30.10.2011 and 8.11.2011 respectively. As per the police report, 0.90 acre of land comprised in Rakba no. 182, situated in village Kabrai, belonging to Smt. Triveni Devi Chauhan, was used by the PWD while constructing a road. However, she was not paid any compensation by the PWD. Hence, the case did not relate to the police department. The SE stated in his report that a by-pass road, 3,600 km. long connecting NH No. 86 and NH No. 76 was constructed by the PWD in the year 2007. During the construction, no farmer raised any objection. The report further stated that a 'Chak Road' already existed and at some places private land was also used. However, there was no provision for paying any compensation to any farmer. Admittedly, some land belonging to the complainant was used by the PWD in the construction of the road. Hence, she should have been given compensation as per law. The Commission therefore directed the Chief Secretary, UP to submit a report in the matter. Pursuant thereto, the Special Secretary, PWD, UP Government, Lucknow, has sent a report dated 18.2.2013 enclosing therewith reports of other officers and a copy of the registered sale deed of the land executed by Smt. Triveni Devi in favour of the State Government of UP through Executive Engineer, Mahoba after receiving a cheque dated 15.12.2012 of SBI Mahoba for Rs. 9,10,000/- as sale consideration. The Commission has considered the above report and papers. Due to the intervention of the Commission and taking up of the matter with the Chief Secretary of UP Government, the complainant Smt. Triveni Devi, owner of the land ultimately got justice. The State Government paid her the fair price of her 0.90 acres of land used for construction of public road at the market rate. Thus her grievance stood satisfactorily removed. No further enquiry/action is required. The case is closed. Inform the complainant accordingly.
Action TakenConcluded and No Further Action Required (Dated 5/16/2013 )
Status on 5/23/2013The Case is Closed.

Note: For further details kindly contact National Human Rights Commission, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi, PIN 110001 Tel.No. 23385368 Fax No. 23384863 E-Mail: covdnhrc@hub.nic.in
Disclaimer: Neither NHRC nor NIC is responsible for any inadvertent error that may have crept in the Complaint Information being published on NET. The Complaint Information on net is for immediate information to the Complainants/ Victims.

We need reconciliation with justice process as non violence tool between violence and silence:Lenin Raghuvanshi

It is bad that violence promotes violence.We need reconciliation with justice process as non violence tool between violence and silence.

Defamation of Human Rights defenders of PVCHR


To,
The Ministry of Home Affairs
Government of India
New Delhi

Subject: In reference to unethical and objectionable comments about an institution leading to severe mental harassment.

 Dear sir,

People’s Vigilance Committee on Human Rights (PVCHR) is working in the field of human rights which involves advocacy for the rights of women, children and other deprived sections of the society and creating social transformation for just,plural society based on democracy,non -violence,rule of law and secularism. Our organization has been taking initiatives to intervene on behalf of the victims of domestic violence. The organization has taken up the case of Ms. Sapana Chaurasia who filed a case of her persistent mental and physical harassment by her husband Mr. Sunil Gupta under domestic violence law. With the intention of taking revenge our orgasation’s Director has been continuously receiving threatening calls by Ms.Sapna Chaurasia’s husband Mr. Sunil Gupta and additionally higher government officials have been threatening the director on telephone to not to intervene on behalf of Ms. Sapana in her case.   Mr. Sunil Gupta also filed a false case in Uttar Pradesh High Court in which court gave its decision in favour of the organization. Ms. Sapana, wife of Mr. Sunil Gupta has made her statement before the senior police officials that her life is under threat from Mr. Sunil Gupta. In spite of this Mr. Sunil Gupta is using unethical means to put pressure on me and the director of the organization so that our organization can be forced not to represent Sapana’s case to get her justice. http://www.pvchr.net/2013/01/india-threats-to-human-rights-defenders.html

Sunil Gupta has been writing on the social networking site Face book (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100005957461849&ref=ts&fref=ts) that our organisaiton has kept Sapana as a hostage. Whereas the fact is that Sunil Gupta’s wife has willingly decided to live with her sister.  Ms. Sapana Chaurasia has already recorded her statement before the honorable High Court on which the honorable High Court has given clear directions while recognizing that Sapana Chaurasia has the right and freedom to live in a place of her choice. http://www.scribd.com/doc/132395197/Order-of-High-Court-in-case-of-sapana

Whereas Ms. Sapana has made recorded statements before the court and top police officials on many occasions that her husband Mr. Sunil Gupta had attempted to kill her in the past and her life is still under threat.

On 24th April, 2013 three unidentified person forcibly entered the house of the director of the organization Mr. Lenin and fired on him with the intention to kill. It is believed that the assault was motivated and stage-managed by Mr. Sunil Gupta.

Now, Mr. Sunil Gupta has started using unethical means. On 14 May,2013 Mr. Sunil Gupta wrote objectionable comments about the managing trustee of the organization in  the social networking site Face Book, the comments were aimed at assassinating the  character of a woman, a criminal offence under Indian law. The act is not only distressing and disturbing for a woman but also for the organization. Above all, it is feared that Mr. Sunil Gupta can resort to any other unfair means against the organization to harm in future. A complaint regarding that an FIR no: 418/13, section 66 G, 66 H, 67 B under the IT Act.

Mr. Sunil Gupta has also written in the social networking site Face Book that he and his wife face the danger of being killed to mislead whereas his wife her herself state before the court and other officials that her life is under threat particularly from Mr. Sunil Gupta.

The most disturbing and alarming fact is that Mr. Sunil Gupta is not educated to the extent that he can manage a social networking site in such a manner. Therefore it is feared that someone else or a third party may be involved who is instigating Mr. Sunil Gupta to use illegal means not permitted under law.

It is therefore requested that the matter should be taken seriously and Mr. Sunil Gupta should be arrested for writing unethical comments without any concrete evidences and he should be interrogated in case of physical assault on the director of the organization. It   is also requested that after tracing his IP address and those involved in the act of defaming the organisation should be arrested.

The above shows the site which carries Sunil Gupta’s comments and photographs used by him. He has also made comments about the marriage of the sister of the director saying that marriage party is a travesty and against Indian customs.

Sincerely
Shruti Nagvanshi




Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Weaver's family gets govt help only after hunger consumes four lives


Thanks to Parul Sharma and 200 Swedish donors for first support of ten thousand to Family through Ms. Shruti Nagvanshi,( http://shrutinagvanshi.com/we-as-team/shruti-nagvanshi/) Founder and managing trustee of PVCHR.  

"Some people are spreading misleading information that the children died of diarrhea but that is not true. These children died of hunger and malnutrition," said Shruti. 


Shruti, head of a human rights organisation, working among weavers in Varanasi says that Naazra had an Above Poverty Line (APL) card. However, soon after the death of her two children, the district administration lost no time to issue her a BPL card. The Weaver Card will enable her to avail the benefits of welfare schemes.
Questioning the ‘benevolence’ of the district administration, Shruti said, “If the family was not under extreme poverty and malnutrition, why have they been given a BPL card, Weaver Card and food grains? How can the district administration claim that the two children died of the disease when the post mortem of the bodies was not conducted?” 
She maintained that the Naazra family suffered from extreme poverty and malnutrition. Whatever little Naazra earned as a saree weaver, went in purchasing foodgrains. The family was dependent on doles from neighbours, but the financial condition of neighbours was also not good. 

उत्तर प्रदेश के बनारस में नजरा खातून के दो बच्चे भूख से मर गए। आखिर कब तक भूख से देश में मौत होती रहेगी... इसी पर बड़ी खबर में चर्चा... Thanks Shruti for great intervention. Keep fight against hunger and malnutrition

While one member of the family, Nazia Parveen had high fever at that time but they did not consider it important to give medicine to get relief.  When the regional officer was contacted on phone by a member of PVCHR in this regard, he replied that while coming from CMO’s office, he would deliver the medicines. After 2 pm in the afternoon, the social activists of PVCHR took Nazia to a private hospital nearby for the treatment where on the advice of the doctor, X-Ray and blood tests of Nazia were done. Nazia had been complaining of high fever and cough. On the basis of doctor’s prescription Nazia was given paracetamol, anti-biotic and energy related medicines.

Gwangju Human Rights Award to Min K Naing


Lenin Raghuvanshi giving bouquet to Min Ko Naing(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Min_Ko_Naing) receiving Gwangju Prize for Human Rights 2009 (http://www.elevenmyanmar.com/politics/3195-min-ko-naing-to-visit-korea-and-us) at World Forum of Human Rights cities on 16 May 2013 with hand of Chairperson of May 18 Foundation and Mayor of Gawngju,South Korea.




Monday, May 20, 2013

Min KO Naing in Gwangju

Lenin Raghuvanshi of PVCHR met with Min Ko Naing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Min_Ko_Naing) at welcoming lunch of Gwangju Prize for Human Rights 2013 Laureate at Gwangju,South Korea.